Love your channel, but as someone working at the time, there was definitely logging in, e-commerce, and more. Read-only?? We weren't savages back then!
you should make a video why Java isn't the same as JavaScript xD
this wasnt machine learning this was Facebook, and Google listening to your conversations when you were off line through whatsapp and andriod
Why is it scary? It's a good thing. Everything can be tailored to your liking to a point that even you would never have been able to imagine because the algorithms can create links between many things you will never realize or understand to make your life easier and just better overall 😊.Why is it scary to give your info to a corporation for it to sell it? It's not like they can actually sell real info about you (unless you give it to them and consent to it willingly, which 99.99% of people already do without realizing it). It's mostly just behavioral information.Privacy is an illusion anyway 😝.
Video start at
The answer starts at
Starts on
The video starts at for anyone who doesn't want to have their time wasted by useless context and an in video advertisement.
explain starts at 😁
video starts
Starts from
starts at
Dude your describing Peer-to-Peer. You even said it was like a torrent. That goes as far back as napster most online games back in those days were Peer-to-Peer as well.
Please can i get a link for Odyssey (mentioned at ) Im curious about that :)
“That’s for another video” i’m gonna need to see that video, this is a massive concern.
need that video on possible solutions. Love what you do sharing with everyone
What your describing with DAO's and how companies will be ran the people with the most tokens what your describing already exists and they're called 'SHAREHOLDERS' sometimes majority shareholders are members of a board. These board members are sometimes hired separately or voted in by other majority shareholders and they dictate to the CEO how they expect the company to be run and by law the CEO has to run the company in a way to make the shareholders money. Also companies are not magically going to be decentralized just because you call it a DAO and use crypto. They're still shareholders just with crypto-bro buzz words.
) "means that there are no CEOs and President to impress", then the video quickly add "those with the most tokens gets to vote". Isn't that the same thing? The only difference now is, the richest people get to decide how the Web 3.0 is run. I have a feeling it will not a us (typical citizens and developers), rather it would be government and venture capitalists.
Facebook and Twitter don't need your personal information to delete your posts, block your account, or ban you by either your IP address like they do now or by your crypto-wallet because guess what these companies are already tooling up for the change. Honestly you would have to be outside your mind if you think these companies are going to let their biggest asset and revenue stream go away due to new tech they're already investing in. What you'll probably see is that all these 'Free' services that Google, Facebook, Twitter, maybe Amazon provide now will instead ask you to electronically sign something with a lot of fine print allowing them have unrestricted collection and use of your data in return for an email account. This will be common practice across the industry even with companies like Amazon and Walmart's online store. The difference from this and what we have now can be seen with Facebook's Metaverse plans. These companies aren't going to settle just for reading your emails, logging all your buying habits, or tracking what pornsites your on. We'll probably see this push to expand the services these companies offer in an attempt to lock people into a platform. So it would be my worst fear that they'll turn the internet into something like Apple's ecosystem or just turn all internet into something as restrictive as a console platform or the mobile internet.
i sense a strong rise in crime, due to the police being unable to track people down
would have been a perfect place to promote some kind of VPN😂
Facebook(Meta) and Google(Alphabet) are ready for this and they're not going anywhere. The government could hit all of these giant tech companies with anti-trust lawsuits and force them to break up, but guaranteed they'll take advantage of all the loopholes with these unregulated DOA's and umbrella all the new separate companies under a new DAO. Then this new parent DAO will split tokens equally amongst the new smaller companies making them all majority stake holders under one company/DAO.
Or like them taking metaverse, and naming themselves meta.
Facebook creating the company "Meta" trying to get the public to believe it started the METAVERSE lol
its funny at you talk about facebook/web 2.0 and claiming it as their idea, which they just did by converting their company name to meta, trying to own the metaverse, let that sink in.
